By Michael Morris
During this textbook, Michael Morris bargains a serious advent to the vital problems with the philosophy of language. each one bankruptcy focusses on one or texts that have had a seminal impression on paintings within the topic, and makes use of those as a fashion of drawing close either the crucial themes and some of the traditions of facing them. Texts contain vintage writings by way of Frege, Russell, Kripke, Quine, Davidson, Austin, Grice and Wittgenstein. Theoretical jargon is saved to a minimal and is totally defined each time it truly is brought. the diversity of themes coated contains feel and reference, certain descriptions, right names, natural-kind phrases, de re and de dicto necessity, propositional attitudes, truth-theoretical ways to which means, radical interpretation, indeterminacy of translation, speech acts, intentional theories of which means, and scepticism approximately which means. The publication should be precious to scholars and to all readers who're drawn to the character of linguistic which means.
Read or Download An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language PDF
Similar logic & language books
Now a lot revised for the reason that its first visual appeal in 1941, this publication, regardless of its brevity, is extraordinary for its scope and rigor. It presents a unmarried strand of easy recommendations for the critical enterprise of recent good judgment. simple formal strategies are defined, the paraphrasing of phrases into symbols is handled at a few size, and a trying out technique is given for truth-function good judgment besides an entire facts approach for the good judgment of quantifiers.
The current choice of seventeen papers, such a lot of them already released in overseas philosophical journals, offers either with matters within the philosophy of good judgment, the philosophy of arithmetic, the philosophy of language and epistemology. the 1st half comprises serious tests and slightly deviant renderings of the paintings of 2 seminal philosophers, Frege and Husserl, in addition to of the younger Carnap and Kripke.
This ebook is meant either as a textbook in symbolic good judgment for undergraduate and graduate scholars and as a treatise at the foundations of common sense.
“The determinate negation” has by means of Robert Brandom been known as Hegel’s such a lot basic conceptual software. during this e-book, Terje Sparby consents in regards to the significance of the time period, yet rejects Brandom’s interpretation of it. Hegel’s real use of the time period might at the beginning appear to be inconsistent, anything that's mirrored within the scholarship.
- Elementary Categories, Elementary Toposes
- Critical Thinking: 50 Best Strategies to Think Smart and Clear, Get Logical Thinking, and Improve Your Decision Making Skills
- Because without cause: non-causal explanations in science and mathematics
- Wittgenstein's Tractatus: a dialectical interpretation
- An Introduction to Symbolic Logic
- Practical Reason Philosophical Papers Vol I
Extra resources for An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language
During this period, he used almost interchangeably two German words which have to do with meaning. One is ‘Bedeutung’ (a noun from the verb ‘bedeuten’): this might naturally be translated by ‘signiﬁcance’ or ‘signiﬁcation’, as well as ‘meaning’. The other is ‘Sinn’, which is naturally translated by ‘sense’. By the 1890s, however, he had come to see that he needed to distinguish two aspects of meaning, and he used these two words to mark them. The basis of Frege’s mature account of language is his theory of Bedeutung.
The term has to be understood as ﬁrst introducing a condition of some kind, and only then picking out an object, in virtue of the object’s meeting that condition. This view ﬁts easily with Frege’s suggestion that a linguistic expression can have Sense without reference, which looks like a kind of counterpart to the Lockean view that you can perceive the same Idea, whether or not you are hallucinating. The Sense of an expression contains the mode of presentation – that is, it contains the condition which an object has to meet to count as the referent of the expression.
Consider for example – it’s Frege’s example16 – the Concept horse, the referent of the predicate ‘x is a horse’. Frege is adamant that the Concept horse is not an object: it’s the referent of a predicate, not of a singular term. Unfortunately, he seems bound to treat the phrase ‘the Concept horse’ as a singular term, in which case it is bound to refer to an object. And this, in turn, threatens the distinction between Concepts and objects. Consider, for example, the following sentence: (*) The Concept horse is not an object.
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language by Michael Morris